Picture a tournament organiser who has been running a local fighting game event out of a rented venue for years, covering shortfalls out of pocket, scrambling for setups, and watching attendance dip as the cost of living bites harder. Now a $1 million fund shows up at the door. The catch? The money has a complicated return address.
Evo, the largest fighting game tournament in the world, announced its Evo Locals program last week. The initiative has two parts: a directory of grassroots fighting game events currently in beta at evo.gg/locals, and a $1M annual support fund with applications opening later this year in Q4. The community reaction has been anything but simple.
Use code TRYHARD33 at checkout to redeem this offer before code expires again.
Get 33% Off GAMES+ Subscription
What the fund actually covers
Here's the thing: this isn't a prize pool injection. The Evo Locals program is explicitly designed to help organisers run better events, covering costs like venue fees, additional setups, production equipment, staffing, graphic designers, trailer makers, social media support, and introductions to commentators. That framing matters. Prize pot bonuses have a mixed track record in the FGC, and the people who have been in the trenches running locals know it.
Stuart Saw, CEO of RTS (the company that owns and operates Evo), framed the program around community growth: "From day one, Evo has always been about the community that is so diverse around the globe. Our goal with our Evo Locals Program is to help the community solve their challenges, from equipment to player connectivity, and help build the next generation of fighting game competitors and fans."
The timing also connects to Evo's recent expansion into multiple regional major events, which raised legitimate concerns about whether large-scale branded tournaments would pull attention and resources away from the smaller events that built the FGC in the first place. The fund reads, at least on paper, as a response to that concern.
Why many TOs are genuinely relieved
For tournament organisers already running locals at a loss, the fund addresses real, immediate problems. Locals are often subsidised by the organisers themselves, who charge entry fees that barely cover venue hire while keeping costs low enough that players will actually show up.
Sway, a New York-based tournament organiser and co-founder of the DIY fighting game event in New York, called it "one of the best things Evo can do" given the current competition from multiple Evo-branded majors. His one request: that locals keep their identity intact. "I hope they allow locals to keep their identity and avoid adding sponsors too much into the mix," he said, pointing to event renaming as a specific concern.
Hassan "Spag" Farooq, a British Tekken commentator and content creator, described locals as the "bread and butter" of the FGC. His read on the fund is straightforwardly positive: if this money helps organisers maintain and grow their events, it feeds back into larger tournaments like Evo itself down the line. Fighting game player Ted Beneke put it bluntly on X: "If you personally aren't giving money to your locals, then do not criticize any local that accepts this money. They have families to feed and hosting locals consistently costs money."
For players curious about how the FGC intersects with newer competitive formats, the Marvel Tokon Fighting Souls full roster guide is worth a look given the game's prominent appearance at Evo this year.
The Saudi Arabia problem
Evo was fully acquired by Saudi Arabia earlier this year, with RTS operating under the umbrella of Saudi state investment. That context is what splits the FGC community's reaction to this fund so sharply.
Sportswashing, the practice of using sports and entertainment investment to rehabilitate a government's international reputation, is the word appearing repeatedly in community discussions. Saudi Arabia has faced sustained criticism from human rights organisations over issues including the use of the death penalty, treatment of LGBTQ+ individuals, and broader humanitarian concerns. For many in the FGC, accepting money connected to that government, even indirectly through a program run by people inside Evo who may have entirely good intentions, is a line they won't cross.
Paul 'Dark Onion', a tournament organiser from the Irish fighting game community, was direct: "Saudi Arabia's Public Investment Fund can't purchase the FGC outright as it is too nebulous, distributed and sprawling; so they're attempting to purchase our goodwill and support via cash while in turn entwining themselves into the grassroots scene."
He added that even setting aside his personal opposition, accepting the fund would cost him roughly half his attendance. The community he serves has already made its position on PIF-connected events clear.
fhASSA, organiser of Cologne Fight Night, noted on X that his event takes place in the gay and queer capital of Germany, and concluded the Qiddiya-connected support program wasn't a fit. Kelpie, a UK-based player, went further, describing the fund as an attempt to monopolise grassroots events through financial dependency.
The corner tournament organisers are backed into
The hardest part of this conversation is that both sides are describing a real problem. Locals are financially strained. The people running them are often doing so at personal cost, in communities where players are also stretched thin. The fund addresses something genuine.
Californian player Yung P captured the bind on X: "Utilizing funding obviously has lingering ethical implications (especially within our FGC), while refraining keeps tournament organisers in financial strain. Our community expects low prices, yet we often chastise TOs who increase their venue/game costs. What are TOs even supposed to do here?"
There's also a competitive dynamic that doesn't get discussed as much. A local that takes the fund gets better setups, a nicer venue, experienced commentators. Players who are unaware of or unbothered by the Saudi ownership question may simply choose the better-run event. That puts events that decline the fund at a structural disadvantage, not just a moral one.
Player and content creator Avataryaya offered a different frame entirely: "I'm a firm believer of taking evil stuff and flipping it." The pragmatic case is that money flowing into grassroots events, regardless of origin, does real good for real people.
The Evo Locals program launches in earnest in Q4. The terms attached to the grant and partnership applications will tell the full story. For now, every tournament organiser in the FGC is doing the same calculation: what the money is worth, what it costs, and whether those two numbers can ever actually balance. Check out our gaming guides for more coverage of the competitive gaming scene as this story develops.
