• Home
  • Games
  • Guides
  • News
  • Reviews
  • Quests
  • Mystery Box
  • Buy Games
  • Lists
  • GAMES+
  • Deals & Discounts
  • Gaming Calendar (Unlock with GAMES+)
Ubisoft Wants You to Destroy Your Games
    reader.outline.sectionCountreader.outline.progress
    1. Home
    2. News
    3. Assassin’s Creed Shadows
    4. Ubisoft Wants You to Destroy Your Games

    Ubisoft Wants You to Destroy Your Games

    Ubisoft’s latest EULA demands players destroy their games if access is revoked - even physical copies. Here’s why that matters, and what it says about the future of game ownership in 2025.

    Eliza Crichton-Stuart

    Eliza Crichton-Stuart

    •

    updatedLabel Dec 2, 2025

    Ubisoft Wants You to Destroy Your Games

    There was a time when buying a game meant something. You saved up, went to the store, grabbed that box off the shelf, and walked out knowing you owned it. No account needed. No launcher. No 20-page EULA. You could play it years later, pass it down, lend it to a friend, or just keep it on your shelf like a trophy. The disc was yours, the memories were yours, and no one could take that away.

    Now Ubisoft says you should destroy it.

    Buried in Ubisoft’s latest End User License Agreement - the one you have to accept to play any of their games or use Ubisoft Connect - is a line that feels like something out of a bad joke: “Upon termination for any reason, You must immediately uninstall the Product and destroy all copies of the Product in Your possession.”

    Ubisoft Wants You to Destroy Your Games

    Ubisoft Wants You to Destroy Your Games

    Seriously. If they revoke your license - and they can do that for basically any reason - they expect you to delete the game and physically destroy every copy you have. Even if it’s a disc. Even if you paid for it. Even if it’s been sitting on your shelf since 2014.

    Now, no one’s saying Ubisoft is going to show up at your door with a sledgehammer. This is probably just legal boilerplate meant to cover their bases. But it doesn’t make it any less ridiculous. It’s a perfect example of how far we’ve strayed from real ownership in gaming - and how little control players actually have anymore.

    Back in the day, if a company went under, your games still worked. Your Dreamcast still ran Jet Set Radio. Your old PC still played Myst. It didn’t matter if the publisher vanished - what you bought was yours. That’s what made it special.

    Today? If Ubisoft or another big publisher decides they’re done supporting a game, or just doesn’t like something about your account, they can yank your access. And now, they’re saying that includes your physical copies too.

    Ubisoft Wants You to Destroy Your Games

    Ubisoft Wants You to Destroy Your Games

    It’s frustrating, but it’s not surprising. Ubisoft hasn’t exactly been winning fans lately. Skull and Bones finally launched this year and immediately capsized. Star Wars Outlaws had the Star Wars name but not the staying power. And Assassin’s Creed Shadows tried to be everything at once and ended up being just ok at all of it.

    And while Ubisoft takes the heat here, they’re not alone. Xbox has quietly removed dozens of games from its digital store, many with no warning. Always-online Digital Rights Management (DRM) is creeping into single-player titles. Publishers across the board are turning what used to be a straightforward purchase into a fragile license that can vanish at any time.

    This isn’t just about a weird EULA clause. It’s about what we’ve lost. Gaming used to be permanent. Tangible. Something you could hold, keep, and come back to. Now it’s tied to accounts, servers, and the fine print.

    No, you probably don’t need to smash your copy of Watch Dogs. But the fact that Ubisoft thinks it can tell you to? That’s the part worth smashing.

    Eliza Crichton-Stuart author avatar

    Eliza Crichton-Stuart

    Head of Operations

    Opinion

    updated

    December 2nd 2025

    posted

    July 14th 2025

    relatedNews

    View All
    Exposing the Myth of Digital Ownership image
    a year ago•readingTime

    Exposing the Myth of Digital Ownership

    Despite promises of true ownership, recent web3 game shutdowns show players still rely on centralized control. In the end, asset ownership is only as real as the platform allows.

    Opinion
    Why True Ownership Really Matters In Gaming image
    2 years ago•readingTime

    Why True Ownership Really Matters In Gaming

    Discover notable instances where gamers lost their digital assets and explore how true ownership through blockchain technology could revolutionize gaming.

    Educational
    Sony Files Patent for Time-Restricted Ownership of NFTs image
    3 years ago•readingTime

    Sony Files Patent for Time-Restricted Ownership of NFTs

    Sony has filed an official patent for time-restricted ownership of NFTs, hinting towards the gaming giant's entrance into web3 gaming in the near future.

    Is In-Game Customization Really What Keeps Players Hooked?
    10 hours ago•readingTime

    Is In-Game Customization Really What Keeps Players Hooked?

    In-game customization can improve player engagement, but gameplay, social features, progression, and regular content updates often have a bigger impact on player retention.

    Opinion
    What Happened to Treeverse's $END Token?
    2 months ago•readingTime

    What Happened to Treeverse's $END Token?

    Endless Clouds launched its $END token using a DEX-first approach, resulting in notable sell pressure and a rapid drop in valuation. The token’s future depends on community support and development.

    Opinion
    +1
    Challenges and Criteria for Success in Web3
    2 months ago•readingTime

    What is the Criteria for Success in Web3?

    Discover the challenges of web3 game development and the foundational criteria needed for success, as outlined by Sinjin, founder of MAYG.

    Opinion
    +2